Andrew’s recent reviews of Resident Evil:Extinction and Eastern Promises got me thinking. I’m not knocking on Andrew or anything but his 3.5 out of 5 for Resident Evil and his 3 out of 5 for Eastern Promises made me go huh whats up. So I sat down and thought a bit of how I rate movies. I can not really comment on Resident Evil at all since I’ve yet to see it but I can comment on what he said and the rating for Eastern Promises.
Andrew had this to say about Resident Evil: Extinction
…the sort of popcorn fun that one can enjoy. Should you be looking for anything else, try another screen in your local multi-plex.
Now since I haven’t seen it I’ll go right along with his opinion and truthfully from the previews I’d say thats pretty much what I expected. So it succeeded at being mindless entertainment. Not a great movie but as Andrew said there is no real attachment to the characters.
Okay now on to Eastern Promises
Having said all of the above, the movie is not a total meltdown. It definitely has its moments and the intensity of a couple of scenes really impact hard enough for some emotional craters.
So, both movies ended up being okay for Andrew, I’m curious which movie Andrew would watch again personally but really that isn’t the point of this post.
The point of this post is to see if anyone has a way we could rate movies that would actually be fair to the movie. Is Resident Evil: Extinction really a better movie than Eastern Promises or was it simply the subject matter plus his expectations that lowered the rating for Eastern Promises. I went into latter with lower expectations than Andrew. While I enjoyed History of Violence (Movie Patron Review), I thought the third act was rather weak and it almost ruined the movie for me. History of Violence is actually a perfect example, I had my expectations of the movie and when Cronenburg deviated I really started to dislike the movie. I found that Eastern Promises did not deviate and even though the story was not complex it told it really well. I sympathized with all the characters (even Vincent Cassel’s). If I were rating the movie I’d probably give it a 4 out of 5.
Andrew generally likes Zombie movies. He has said this many times and therefore as long as Resident Evil: Extinction wasn’t total crap there was a good chance it would get a good rating. I’m not faulting Andrew, I’m the same way when it comes to Asian crime dramas.
So is it basically my lower expectations and the fact that I could sympathize a bit more with the characters that allow me to enjoy the movie more. If so then perhaps I am rating movies in the wrong way. Should we (and by we mean anyone who rates a movie) take a more clinical approach. Should put a numerical value to things parts of the movie like Acting, Plot, Characters, Action and Emotional Impact to name a few. If so how do we actually come up with something that can apply to all movies. One review might find the plot of a movie distasteful while another might find it intriguing.
Would it be a good thing to look at movies clinically or should they be looked at, studied and reviewed in an emotional way. Can we really compare movies of different genres with the same rating scale and finally is Resident Evil: Extinction really a better movie than Eastern Promises.













I can pretty much guarantee that both Andrew, and I will be at the theatre watching 
I have been doing a bit of traveling for work this past week and I brought along my laptop with some DVDs to watch. One of the movies that I brought with me was
Over at AICN, they are reporting that the trailer for the long awaited fourth installment in the “Indiana Jones” franchise will appear in front of Paramount Pictures’ “Beowulf” on November 16th.
It’s nice to see Jon Stewart confirmed to host the Oscars again. I always feel that every host should get two cracks at being there. First time hosts never really get comfortable until about the last 30 minutes of the show, so let em try again next year I say.
There has been talk lately of there possibly being a sequel to Verhoeven’s, 1990 movie 